From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

Right-Wing Media Are in Trouble



The flow of traffic to Donald TrumpÆs most loyal digital-media boosters
isnÆt just slowing; itÆs utterly collapsing.
By Paul Farhi

April 13, 2024

As you may have heard, mainstream news organizations are facing a financial crisis. Many liberal publications have taken an even more severe beating.
But the most dramatic declines over the past few years belong to
conservative and right-wing sites. The flow of traffic to Donald TrumpÆs
most loyal digital-media boosters isnÆt just slowing, as in the rest of the industry; itÆs utterly collapsing.

This past February, readership of the 10 largest conservative websites was down 40 percent compared with the same month in 2020, according to The Righting, a newsletter that uses monthly data from Comscoreùessentially the Nielsen ratings of the internetùto track right-wing media. (February is the most recent month with available Comscore data.) Some of the bigger names
in the field have been pummeled the hardest: The Daily Caller lost 57
percent of its audience; Drudge Report, the granddaddy of conservative aggregation, was down 81 percent; and The Federalist, founded just over a decade ago, lost a staggering 91 percent. (The siteÆs CEO and co-founder,
Sean Davis, called that figure ôlaughably inaccurateö in an email but
offered no further explanation.) FoxNews.com, by far the most popular conservative-news site, has fared better, losing ôonlyö 22 percent of
traffic, which translates to 23 million fewer monthly site visitors
compared with four years ago.

Enjoy a year of unlimited access to The Atlanticùincluding every story on
our site and app, subscriber newsletters, and more.
Become a Subscriber

Some amount of the decline over that period was probably inevitable, given that 2020 was one of the most intense and newsiest years in decades,
propping up publications across the political spectrum. But that doesnÆt explain why the falloff has been especially steep on the right side of the media aisle.

WhatÆs going on? The obvious culprit is Facebook. For years, FacebookÆs mysterious algorithms served up links to news and commentary articles,
sending droves of traffic to their publishers. But those days are gone.
Amid criticism from elected officials and academics who said the social-
media giant was spreading hate speech and harmful misinformation, including Russian propaganda, before the 2016 election, Facebook apparently came to question the value of featuring news on its platform. In early 2018, it
began deemphasizing news content, giving greater priority to content posted
by friends and family members. In 2021, it tightened the tap a little
further. This past February, it announced that it would do the same on Instagram and Threads. All of this monkeying with the internetÆs plumbing drastically reduced the referral traffic flowing to news and commentary
sites. The changes have affected everyone involved in digital media,
including some liberal-leaning sitesùsuch as Slate (which saw a 42 percent traffic drop), the Daily Beast (41 percent), and Vox (62 percent, after
losing its two most prominent writers)ùbut the impact appears to have been
the worst, on average, for conservative media. (Referral traffic from
Google has also declined over the past few years, but far less sharply.)



Unsurprisingly, the people who run conservative outlets see this as straightforward proof that Big Tech is trying to silence them. Neil Patel,
a co-founder (with Tucker Carlson) of the Daily Caller, told me that the
tech giants want ôto crush any independent media that was perceived to have been helpful to TrumpÆs rise.ö Patel calls this a form of ôBig Techûdriven viewpoint discriminationö that ôshould scare any fair-minded individual.ö

A simpler explanation is that conservative digital media are disproportionately dependent on social-media referrals in the first place. Many mainstream publications have long-established brand names, large newsrooms to churn out copy, and, in a few cases, large numbers of loyal subscribers. Sites like Breitbart and Ben ShapiroÆs The Daily Wire,
however, were essentially Facebook-virality machines, adept at injecting irresistibly outrageous, clickable nuggets into peopleÆs feeds. So the drying-up of referrals hit these publications much harder.



And so far, unlike some publications that have pivoted away from relying on traffic and programmatic advertising, theyÆve struggled to adapt. Rather
than stabilizing amid FacebookÆs new world order, traffic on the right has mostly continued south. Among the big losers over the past year are The Washington Free Beacon, whose traffic was down 58 percent, and Gateway
Pundit, down 62 percent. Compare that with prominent mainstream and liberal sites, which, although still well below their 2020 heights, have at least stanched the bleeding. Traffic to The Washington Post and The New York
Times from February 2023 to February 2024 was essentially flat. SlateÆs was
up 14 percent.

For conservative media publishers, the financial consequences of such a
steep decline in readership are hard to know for certain. None of the best- known names publicly reports revenue figures, and many are supported by
rich patrons who may not be in it for the money. But the situation canÆt be good. Digital media still rely on advertising, and advertising still goes
to places with more, not fewer, people paying attention. Traffic also
drives subscriptions.

More broadly, the loss of readership canÆt be helpful to the ideological cause. Top-drawing sites like the conspiratorial Gateway Pundit and
Infowars help keep the MAGA faithful faithful by recirculating, amplifying, and sometimes creating the culture-war memes and talking points that
dominate right and far-right opinion. Less traffic means less influence.

Paul Farhi: Is American journalism headed toward an æextinction-level
eventÆ?

The Daily CallerÆs Patel insisted that faltering traffic alone isnÆt a
death sentence for the onetime lords of the conservative web. With the addition of a subscription service and tighter financial management, the
Daily CallerÆs financial health is solid and improving, he said. Outlets
like his own can still succeed with people who ôhave lost trust in the corporate media and are actively seeking alternatives.ö

The trouble is that there are now alternatives to the alternatives. The RightingÆs proprietor, Howard Polskin, pointed out to me that the websites that dominated the field in 2016ùFox News, Breitbart, The Washington Times, and so onùare no longer the only players in MAGA world. The marketplace has expanded and fragmented since then, splintering the audience seeking conservative or even extremist perspectives among podcasts, YouTube videos, Substack newsletters, and boutique platforms like Rumble. ôThereÆs a lot of choice,ö Polskin said. ôEven if [the big] sites went out of business
tomorrow, there are a lot of voices still out there.ö

The DIY ethic is embodied by the likes of Megyn Kelly, Bill OÆReilly, Steve Bannon, and Carlson, who became conservative celebrities while working for established media organizations but have maintained their profiles after leaving them in disgrace. Since being fired by Fox News last year, Carlson
has moved his contentious commentaries and interviews (including one with Vladimir Putin) to X. Kelly has come back from a messy divorce with NBC in 2019 (which followed an unhappy exit from Fox News in 2017) to host a massively popular podcast. OÆReilly, likewise forced out of Fox in 2017,
has kept talking via newsletters, video streams, and weekly appearances on
the NewsNation cable channel. And Bannon, the former Trump consigliere who left Breitbart, which he founded, after publicly criticizing the Trump
family, has gone the podcaster route himself; his War Room podcast was
ranked as the leading source of false and misleading information in a broad study of the medium by the Brookings Institution last year.

The precipitous decline in traffic to conservative publications raises a larger and possibly unanswerable question: Did these operations ever really hold the political and cultural clout that critics ascribed to them at
their peak? Recall the liberal anger in 2020 when Ben Shapiro was routinely dominating FacebookÆs most-engaged content list, generating accusations
that FacebookÆs algorithm was favoring right-wing posts and pushing voters toward Trump. Yet Joe Biden went on to win the election easily, and
Democrats overperformed in the 2022 midterms. Now, as conservatives cry
that Big Tech has crushed their traffic, Trump is running neck and neck
with Biden in the polls, even with a legal cloud hanging over him and shortfalls of campaign cash. Maybe who wins the traffic contest doesnÆt
matter as much as it once appeared.


https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/04/conservative-digital- media-traffic/678055/
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2