From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:06:21 +0000, REAL Tall Henry <not@home.org>
wrote:

On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 17:40:36 -0500, Loose Cannon <efberg73@gmx.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 09:22:36 -0800, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

REAL Tall Henryabout 5 hours ago

ReplyPermalinkOn Mon, 12 Jan 2026 18:40:36 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito

Post by Loose Cannon

If she was 15, that means the skank was raped. She should have aborted >>>>>> the byproduct.

There was no rape.

Underage = rape. There was underage anal bestiality.

No, it was underage HETEROSEXUALITY!

In fact, she even wrote a caption on one of her InstaGram posts on
how she used to sneak him into the house when she was 15-16 years old. >>>> Perhaps they can use that to prosecute the gook.

For what? He was a minor at the time too!

In the eyes of the law he's guilty of rape; you could look it up. The
fact that he's a sub-human also makes him guilty of bestiality. What
is it with you gooks and your proclivity towards having sex with
animals? https://katitube.com/video/philippine-dog-porn-20026.html

Gook Ejershito 'thinks' his fellow gook is EXEMPT from prosecution!
LOL

There's a cell waiting for the rapist where he'll receive 'special
treatment' from his fellow inmates when they discover he's there for
child rape. When the White gangs find out that it was a White child he
raped, they'll double his 'pleasure'.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2