1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. alt.folklore.computers
Versionflation

By Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= on Fri Jan 16 08:55:35 2026

Latest reply by Nuno Silva on Fri Jan 16 23:35:49 2026
Re: naughty Pascal

By c186282 on Tue Jan 6 22:37:40 2026

Latest reply by scott on Fri Jan 16 21:40:24 2026
Re: Naughty Advertising (was Re: naughty Pascal)

By Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= on Thu Jan 8 07:01:19 2026

Latest reply by Peter Flass on Wed Jan 14 07:27:35 2026
Re: What is wrong with C? (and fond memories of VAX)

By Charlie Gibbs on Wed Jan 7 06:33:50 2026

Latest reply by rbowman on Tue Jan 13 18:22:20 2026
Re: Naughty Python (was Re: naughty Pascal)

By Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= on Fri Jan 9 18:37:09 2026

Latest reply by rbowman on Tue Jan 13 17:54:52 2026
COBOL compilers (Re: naughty Pascal)

By Lars Poulsen on Wed Jan 7 14:11:10 2026

Latest reply by Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= on Sat Jan 10 20:46:38 2026
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP - What was the competition

By Johnny Billquist on Sat Jan 10 17:38:20 2026

Latest reply by Johnny Billquist on Sat Jan 10 17:38:20 2026
Re: C structure portability, naughty Python

By Charlie Gibbs on Wed Jan 7 06:33:45 2026

Latest reply by Carlos E.R. on Thu Jan 8 14:01:45 2026
Re: Naughty =?UTF-8?Q?C=E2=99=AF?=

By Charlie Gibbs on Wed Jan 7 06:33:47 2026

Latest reply by antispam on Thu Jan 8 01:00:02 2026
Re: Naughty =?UTF-8?B?Q+KZrw==?=

By Bob Vloon on Wed Jan 7 12:01:19 2026

Latest reply by rbowman on Wed Jan 7 21:36:32 2026
=?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Naughty_C=E2=99=AF?=

By The Natural Philosopher on Wed Jan 7 10:02:01 2026

Latest reply by The Natural Philosopher on Wed Jan 7 20:09:45 2026