From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

My low light Camera captured a ton of weird objects in space in full 4k...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CLfu1hKK8o



--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Stargazing Astronomer wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You should post under your real name if you want to be taken seriously here. (How many "stargazing astronomers" are reading this, do you think?)

My low light Camera captured a ton of weird objects in space in full 4k...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CLfu1hKK8o

How, do you think, is that related to the theories of relativity, to justify your crosspost to sci.physics.relativity?

Provided that the video is not fake, given how those "weird space objects"
are moving, they are probably mostly orbiting operational terrestrial satellites or pieces of "space debris" (e.g. remains of launching rockets,
and satellites no longer in operation) of which there are hundreds of
thousands by now; whereas the space debris constitutes an increasing hazard
for operating satellites and spaceflight:

<https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Videos/2019/02/Distribution_of_space_debris_in_orbit_around_Earth>

This was in 2019. There are many more objects now. If you just consider additional satellites, as of January 2026 SpaceX's Starlink constellation consists of 9422 small satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO, h =~ 800 km to
2000 km) [0]

See also:

PBS NewsHour: Human-made debris left behind in outer space is a growing
problem down on Earth
<https://youtu.be/ZnP28QbZx_Y>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_debris>

Also, in the video description you write:

I cranked up my high-end low-light camera, which has a 35mm F0.95 lens,
and pointed it at the night sky. The camera was set to record in 4K video mode, and it captured a ton of objects flying around. Among these was a
good meteor.

A *meteor* [from Anc. Grk.: μετέωρος (metéoros, lit. "beyond air"; from μετά
metá "beyond" + *ἀορος *aoros "thing lifted up/in air"; meaning "related to
celestial phenomena") [1]] is any apparition of light in an atmosphere, typically produced by a _meteoroid_ (lit. "like a thing from above" [2]) a celestial object smaller than an asteroid or comet; typically pieces that
have broken off an asteroid/comet) that (temporarily) enters an atmosphere which causes it to heat up and thus emit light. When a meteoroid impacts
the surface, what remains of it is called a *meteorite* (lit. "rock from above", from Lat. -ites from Anc. Grk. -ίτης -ítes "belonging to" [3]).

So what do you mean by "good meteor"?

Thank you for crossposting to, and thus reminding me of the existence of, sci.astro.* in addition to <news:alt.astronomy>.

___
[0] <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Starlink&oldid=1332121588>
[1] <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/meteor>
[2] <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/meteoroid>
[3] <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/meteorite>
--
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On Sat, 10 Jan 2026 <PointedEars@web.de> 'PointedEars' suggested:

You should post under your real name if you want to be taken seriously here. >(How many "stargazing astronomers" are reading this, do you think?)

With a name like Pointed Ears you would know of course, right?

You tryin' to be Mr Spock? Well you can't, I am!

--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

This man can prove alien life and it's not all satellites and space junk...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4AxP_OZPeE&t=773s


--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On Jan 11, 2026 at 4:30:09 PM EST, "Stargazing Astronomer" <stargazer@solar.system.no.reply.com> wrote:

This man can prove alien life and it's not all satellites and space junk...

https://www.spewtube.com/watch?TotalJunk

Because spewtube videos are well known for scientific accuracy.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Stargazing Astronomer wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Again, your real name belongs there. Or at least an *unambiguous*
pseudonym. Now you can see why.

This man can prove alien life and it's not all satellites and space junk...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4AxP_OZPeE&t=773s

First of all, IMNSHO this has nothing to do with the theories of relativity.
So please stop crossposting (without Followup-To) to
sci.physics.relativity. F'up2 sci.astro set again; please observe this.

Second, this man does NOT present a proof of alien life. He has observed
some lights in the night sky that he cannot explain. But *no* explanation
is just *no* explanation; it does NOT mean that the correct explanation is alien life.

Moreover, he does not even bother to substantiate his claim; he does not
show his analysis, no comparison with the tools he claims to use, and you believe him *blindly*? How can you be so naïve? Or are you just trolling?

I recommend that you watch this to clarify your misconceptions:

"Neil deGrasse Tyson Explains Alien Visits, UFOs, and Other Conspiracies" (2022)
<https://youtu.be/O2jJ3wjEyZk?si=wqCHTceS9jPv1wa3>

"Have Aliens Visited Earth? | StarTalk 101 with Neil deGrasse Tyson" (2024) <https://youtu.be/QNu-c870f0U?si=53RP0104k6MZLx53>

And in general:

"Neil deGrasse Tyson Teaches Scientific Thinking and Communication |
Official Trailer | MasterClass" (2021) <https://youtu.be/io6QdGcoWMU?si=DSw_A7A5J4hR8i7P>
--
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Stargazing Astronomer wrote:

My low light Camera captured a ton of weird objects in space in full 4k...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CLfu1hKK8o

Those weird objects in space are actually monitoring systems from the
other side of the universe and
other dimensions. But they are not being monitored by aliens from other space...
they are simple Nature's monitoring systems, (basic natural products) to
keep the universe on track.

Something has to keep an eye on things.


You never know somebody might build an atomic bomb that can explode the
whole earth.

So, weird objects in space roam the universe and send back the
information...


they are mistaken for flying saucers, but are just Nature's monitoring
systems.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Le 2026-01-09 à 18:31, Stargazing Astronomer a écrit :

My low light Camera captured a ton of weird objects in space in full 4k...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CLfu1hKK8o

Can you rule out fireflies ? NO
Can you rule out dust blown in the wind ? NO
Can you rule out ANY other thing within the atmosphere and close to the
camera ? Again, NO
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 Kualinar <kuakinar@videotron.ca> wrote negatively:

Can you rule out fireflies ? NO
Can you rule out dust blown in the wind ? NO
Can you rule out ANY other thing within the atmosphere and close to the >camera ? Again, NO

The Calvine UFO Incident

The men probably signed a non disclosure of information document for a lump cash sum.

And that's why they can't come forward.

The most genuine ufo / uap photo ever taken...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp17MS1wdes



--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Stargazing Astronomer wrote:

On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 Kualinar <kuakinar@videotron.ca> wrote negatively:

Can you rule out fireflies ? NO
Can you rule out dust blown in the wind ? NO
Can you rule out ANY other thing within the atmosphere and close to the
camera ? Again, NO

The Calvine UFO Incident

The men probably signed a non disclosure of information document for a lump cash sum.

And that's why they can't come forward.

Conspiracy theory.

The most genuine ufo / uap photo ever taken...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp17MS1wdes

<https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/11/what-really-happened-in-calvine-the-mystery-behind-the-best-ufo-picture-ever-seen>
--
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

Stargazing Astronomer wrote:

My low light Camera captured a ton of weird objects in space in full 4k...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CLfu1hKK8o

Those weird objects in space are actually monitoring systems from the
other side of the universe and
other dimensions. But they are not being monitored by aliens from other space...
they are simple Nature's monitoring systems, (basic natural products) to
keep the universe on track.

Something has to keep an eye on things.

You never know somebody might build an atomic bomb that can explode the
whole earth.

So, weird objects in space roam the universe and send back the
information...

they are mistaken for flying saucers, but are just Nature's monitoring systems.

In other words, the Truth is...

there are no flying saucers or alien beings from other planets..
there are no 'other' Earths anywhere else in the universe..
there is only ONE Earth.
Life doesn't exist anywhere else in the universe..

The Pentagon needs a new source of income so they 'make-up'
flying saucer stories and images/video to extort money from the American people.

NAZA has fake monster asteroids, and the Pentagon now own the fake UFO business.

You won't see NASA stepping into the Pentagon terrority.


Ask NASA "What do you think about the Pentagon's UFO's?", and NASA will
say...

"I DON'T KNOW, I DON'T KNOW , I DONT KNOW!"
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 PointedEars Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:

<https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/11/what-really-happened-in-calvine-the-mystery-behind-the-best-ufo-picture-ever-seen>

I'm sorry but I don't accept cookies.

--- Digital Signature --- y98dChWV4romYwZAdHLyCL1yoaJteg/vSAM/XJUgkL3awWNunqCMZnAFHJ5G983xcEpFyUDMkJu855qYHUMiCw==

--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Stargazing Astronomer wrote:

On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 PointedEars Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:

<https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/11/what-really-happened-in-calvine-the-mystery-behind-the-best-ufo-picture-ever-seen>

I'm sorry but I don't accept cookies.

Not *my* problem, as it is not up to me to disprove your claim.

You are welcome to run a (Web) search yourself to substantiate your
outlandish claim (by more than a YouTube video). But keep in mind: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence to support them.

F'up2 sci.astro
--
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Le 2026-01-13 à 15:56, Stargazing Astronomer a écrit :

On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 PointedEars Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:

<https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/11/what-really-happened-in-calvine-the-mystery-behind-the-best-ufo-picture-ever-seen>

I'm sorry but I don't accept cookies.

You do NOT need to accept any cookies to read the article.

So, go ahead and read the article.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Take your pick denier of truth...

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=calvine+ufo



--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Kualinar wrote:

Le 2026-01-13 à 15:56, Stargazing Astronomer a écrit :

On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 PointedEars Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:

<https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/11/what-really-happened-in-calvine-the-mystery-behind-the-best-ufo-picture-ever-seen>

I'm sorry but I don't accept cookies.

You do NOT need to accept any cookies to read the article.

Unfortunately, that is not true. The Guardian has switched to a business
model where you can either accept all advertising and tracking cookies or
buy a monthly subscription. And if you have a subscription, they will have
to use cookies to recognize you.

By contrast, this news story on the same topic can be read even without accepting cookies:

<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjwngn293pvo>

F'up2 sci.astro (unless you know a more fitting group)
--
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Den 14.01.2026 00:24, skrev Stargazing Astronomer:

Take your pick denier of truth...

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=calvine+ufo

Please don't cross-post to sci.physics.relativity

It doesn't belong in any sci.* group

I am sure some alt.ufo.* group exists.

Use it.
--
Paul

https://paulba.no/
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 14.01.2026 00:24, skrev Stargazing Astronomer:

Take your pick denier of truth...

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=calvine+ufo

Please don't cross-post to sci.physics.relativity

It doesn't belong in any sci.* group

I am sure some alt.ufo.* group exists.

Use it.

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

einstein on ufo's..
https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf


eventually...Einstein went on to write, direct and produce the movie: "The Day The Earth Stood Still".
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 14.01.2026 00:24, skrev Stargazing Astronomer:

Take your pick denier of truth...

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=calvine+ufo

Please don't cross-post to sci.physics.relativity

It doesn't belong in any sci.* group

I am sure some alt.ufo.* group exists.

Use it.

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

einstein on ufo's.. https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

eventually...Einstein went on to write, direct and produce the movie: "The Day The Earth Stood Still".

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Earth+is+the+insane+asylum+of+the+universe%22+einstein
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Viewing the Deeper Depths of the Milky Way Galaxy with a Full Spectrum Sony camera Cranked up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9P-UoV8cQOI



--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Le 2026-01-14 à 20:35, Stargazing Astronomer a écrit :

Viewing the Deeper Depths of the Milky Way Galaxy with a Full Spectrum Sony camera Cranked up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9P-UoV8cQOI

ALL the moving objects are satellites. Many satellites are on equatorial orbits, some are on polar orbits, and 1000's are in between.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 14.01.2026 00:24, skrev Stargazing Astronomer:

Take your pick denier of truth...

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=calvine+ufo

Please don't cross-post to sci.physics.relativity

It doesn't belong in any sci.* group

I am sure some alt.ufo.* group exists.

Use it.

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

einstein on ufo's.. https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

As one can see in that ufo documment Albert Einstein sees himself as
president of the planet Earth, and even makes decisions on how aliens
from other planets should be treated as.

https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

It was Albert Einstein who made the
decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan....

he never said he wanted the Germans dead.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On 01/14/2026 11:38 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 14.01.2026 00:24, skrev Stargazing Astronomer:

Take your pick denier of truth...

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=calvine+ufo

Please don't cross-post to sci.physics.relativity

It doesn't belong in any sci.* group

I am sure some alt.ufo.* group exists.

Use it.

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

einstein on ufo's..
https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

As one can see in that ufo documment Albert Einstein sees himself as president of the planet Earth, and even makes decisions on how aliens
from other planets should be treated as.

https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

It was Albert Einstein who made the
decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan....

he never said he wanted the Germans dead.

That snide sort of insinuative snark is bullcrap.

You fatass graseball.


--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

einstein on ufo's.. https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

As one can see in that ufo documment Albert Einstein sees himself as president of the planet Earth, and even makes decisions on how aliens
from other planets should be treated as.

https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

It was Albert Einstein who made the
decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan....

he never said he wanted the Germans dead.

In other words, what no one wants to admit...

just as you have 'self-appointed' moderators infesting
inside unmoderrated newsgroups..

you have people like Albert Einstein becoming 'self-appointed'
moderators as President of The Planet Earth.

It was Albert Einstein who tried to get other countries to
destroy Japan. When that didn't work...

the Atomic Bomb he built did worked.

In other words, Albert Einstein 'started'...WW2.


like they always say, 'they' start all the wars.

--Albert Einstein advocated for an economic boycott of Japan in the
1930s as a way to prevent war, believing that
pressure from leading Western powers would compel Japan to change its aggressive policies in Asia, but
this proposal didn't gain traction; years later, after the atomic
bombings, Einstein expressed deep regret over his own role in the
nuclear arms race--


https://www.nytimes.com/1932/02/28/archives/einstein-advocates-economic-boycott-asks-why-america-england.html



Question: Why did Japan bomb Pearl Harbor?


Albert Einstein told the governments of America, Britian, Germany, France..."Come on man, kill these motherfucking Japaneese!"
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On 01/15/2026 09:03 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 01/14/2026 11:38 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 14.01.2026 00:24, skrev Stargazing Astronomer:

Take your pick denier of truth...

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=calvine+ufo

Please don't cross-post to sci.physics.relativity

It doesn't belong in any sci.* group

I am sure some alt.ufo.* group exists.

Use it.

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

einstein on ufo's..
https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

As one can see in that ufo documment Albert Einstein sees himself as
president of the planet Earth, and even makes decisions on how aliens
from other planets should be treated as.

https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

It was Albert Einstein who made the
decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan....

he never said he wanted the Germans dead.

That snide sort of insinuative snark is bullcrap.

You fatass graseball.

"Maturity", is a notion of independence and comprehension,
reflecting upon beyond physical maturity, aspects of the
emotional, and moral and ethical, and psychological, and
philosophical maturity, in intellectual and philosophical
maturity, and moral and ethical maturity.

Sometimes also related to other quotients, like the abstract
sorts of intelligence quotients, and for along the lines of
mental and emotional and moral and ethical quotients, make
for not just regression to the mean, instead actual development.

Thus, the obnoxious, particularly of the perceived cowardly
variety, is an example of fallacy, you blowhard, the fallacies
of rhetoric which right-thinking people naturally automatically
reject.


So, in common enough terms, act your age not your shoe size,
and like a good person in a world of "nice" vis-a-vis "mean"
instead of your fighting-fish lower animal "sub" and "dom",
since your "carrot" and "stick" don't work on higher animals,
adhere to topicality.

Here the topic is sci.physics.relativity, then whatever relation
to alt.astro's or others' notions of the extra-terrestrial is
mostly about the light-speed limit of relativity theory, I'm
not interested in discussing three-fingered people and grays
and greens and aliens and predators and manta rays and elephants
and squids and cetaceans and Star Frontiers (and Gamma World)
and Star Trek Wars or 40K or vampires or lycanthropes or
cowboys or indians and Cambodians and Mayans and mechwarrior
or infinite legions or the emporer or Men in Black or the
eyeball snakes or alien grey cells or Fontenelle's plurality
of worlds or Le Petit Prince or space opera, it's just not
relevant.


Whether Enceladus has a giant tree or the gates of Jupiter
are a natural marker or the Moon comes and goes or the
Earth has been saved from destruction many times luckily,
it's just not relevant.

Here it's sci.physics.relativity, that it concerns Einstein
is tangential though he's enough an authority on "a theory
of absolutes exception the negative stipulation that motion
is relative, otherwise as a Newtonian theory then with an
L-principle that light's speed is a constant", with a haircut
like Carl Neumann and a big fan of Planck and Lorentz together,
just slurring foul pigments of fallacy in Einsteiniana is
bubkus and mature people are beyond being ashamed by you.

At some point also, they give up being ashamed of you,
and just don't care anymore. Don't care no more.

That said, of course it's a particular aspect of notions
of Buddhism and Christianity to be nice.

Including rejecting the wicked.


--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 01/14/2026 11:38 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 14.01.2026 00:24, skrev Stargazing Astronomer:

Take your pick denier of truth...

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=calvine+ufo

Please don't cross-post to sci.physics.relativity

It doesn't belong in any sci.* group

I am sure some alt.ufo.* group exists.

Use it.

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

einstein on ufo's..
https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

As one can see in that ufo documment Albert Einstein sees himself as
president of the planet Earth, and even makes decisions on how aliens
from other planets should be treated as.

https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

It was Albert Einstein who made the
decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan....

he never said he wanted the Germans dead.

That snide sort of insinuative snark is bullcrap.

You fatass graseball.

I have not heard from that toadstool in months. I see it is lurking in
your shadowlands.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #777-000. Disavowed. Denied. @
NO KINGS For I desire mercy not sacrifice. /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 5.5 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On 01/15/2026 10:26 AM, chine.bleu wrote:

Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 01/14/2026 11:38 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 14.01.2026 00:24, skrev Stargazing Astronomer:

Take your pick denier of truth...

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=calvine+ufo

Please don't cross-post to sci.physics.relativity

It doesn't belong in any sci.* group

I am sure some alt.ufo.* group exists.

Use it.

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

einstein on ufo's..
https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

As one can see in that ufo documment Albert Einstein sees himself as
president of the planet Earth, and even makes decisions on how aliens
from other planets should be treated as.

https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

It was Albert Einstein who made the
decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan....

he never said he wanted the Germans dead.

That snide sort of insinuative snark is bullcrap.

You fatass graseball.

I have not heard from that toadstool in months. I see it is lurking in
your shadowlands.

Yeah, all you opiate addicts and cross-top poppers can go shit a brick.


--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

einstein on ufo's.. https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

As one can see in that ufo documment Albert Einstein sees himself as president of the planet Earth, and even makes decisions on how aliens
from other planets should be treated as.

https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

It was Albert Einstein who made the
decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan....

he never said he wanted the Germans dead.

In other words, what no one wants to admit...

just as you have 'self-appointed' moderators infesting
inside unmoderrated newsgroups..

you have people like Albert Einstein becoming 'self-appointed'
moderators as President of The Planet Earth.

It was Albert Einstein who tried to get other countries to
destroy Japan. When that didn't work...

the Atomic Bomb he built did worked.

In other words, Albert Einstein 'started'...WW2.

like they always say, 'they' start all the wars.

--Albert Einstein advocated for an economic boycott of Japan in the
1930s as a way to prevent war, believing that
pressure from leading Western powers would compel Japan to change its aggressive policies in Asia, but
this proposal didn't gain traction; years later, after the atomic
bombings, Einstein expressed deep regret over his own role in the
nuclear arms race--

https://www.nytimes.com/1932/02/28/archives/einstein-advocates-economic-boycott-asks-why-america-england.html

Question: Why did Japan bomb Pearl Harbor?

Albert Einstein told the governments of America, Britian, Germany, France..."Come on man, kill these motherfucking Japaneese!"

Albert Einstein was very upset or frustrated that no one took any action against Japan.

He wrote in his letters afterwards his speech:

" Why is that not brought about ? " he asked . " Why must each person
and each nation tremble for their existence? "

But, I already asked the askable question: Question: Why did Japan bomb
Pearl Harbor?

Now I'm going to ask the UNASKABLE question...

Why did Albert Einstein wanted Japan dead???


Everybody knows (who knows) he was racist against asian people, but that
is not a
good enough reason to want them all dead.


Why did Albert Einstein wanted America, Britian, Germany,
and France to get together to kill Japan?


The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,...
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On 01/15/2026 12:00 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

einstein on ufo's..
https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

As one can see in that ufo documment Albert Einstein sees himself as
president of the planet Earth, and even makes decisions on how aliens
from other planets should be treated as.

https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

It was Albert Einstein who made the
decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan....

he never said he wanted the Germans dead.

In other words, what no one wants to admit...

just as you have 'self-appointed' moderators infesting
inside unmoderrated newsgroups..

you have people like Albert Einstein becoming 'self-appointed'
moderators as President of The Planet Earth.

It was Albert Einstein who tried to get other countries to
destroy Japan. When that didn't work...

the Atomic Bomb he built did worked.

In other words, Albert Einstein 'started'...WW2.

like they always say, 'they' start all the wars.

--Albert Einstein advocated for an economic boycott of Japan in the
1930s as a way to prevent war, believing that
pressure from leading Western powers would compel Japan to change its
aggressive policies in Asia, but
this proposal didn't gain traction; years later, after the atomic
bombings, Einstein expressed deep regret over his own role in the
nuclear arms race--

https://www.nytimes.com/1932/02/28/archives/einstein-advocates-economic-boycott-asks-why-america-england.html

Question: Why did Japan bomb Pearl Harbor?

Albert Einstein told the governments of America, Britian, Germany,
France..."Come on man, kill these motherfucking Japaneese!"

Albert Einstein was very upset or frustrated that no one took any action against Japan.

He wrote in his letters afterwards his speech:

" Why is that not brought about ? " he asked . " Why must each person
and each nation tremble for their existence? "

But, I already asked the askable question: Question: Why did Japan bomb
Pearl Harbor?

Now I'm going to ask the UNASKABLE question...

Why did Albert Einstein wanted Japan dead???

Everybody knows (who knows) he was racist against asian people, but that
is not a
good enough reason to want them all dead.

Why did Albert Einstein wanted America, Britian, Germany,
and France to get together to kill Japan?

The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,...

What's worse than "self-appointed moderators"
is "psi-affective agitators".


--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

There are cloaked spaceships hiding in the night sky over our neighborhood...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhB6zlQ_IKs&t=535s



--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

There are cloaked spaceships hiding in the night sky over our neighborhood...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhB6zlQ_IKs&t=535s


--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Am Donnerstag000015, 15.01.2026 um 21:00 schrieb The Starmaker:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

einstein on ufo's..
https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

As one can see in that ufo documment Albert Einstein sees himself as
president of the planet Earth, and even makes decisions on how aliens
from other planets should be treated as.

https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

It was Albert Einstein who made the
decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan....

he never said he wanted the Germans dead.

In other words, what no one wants to admit...

just as you have 'self-appointed' moderators infesting
inside unmoderrated newsgroups..

you have people like Albert Einstein becoming 'self-appointed'
moderators as President of The Planet Earth.

It was Albert Einstein who tried to get other countries to
destroy Japan. When that didn't work...

the Atomic Bomb he built did worked.

In other words, Albert Einstein 'started'...WW2.

like they always say, 'they' start all the wars.

--Albert Einstein advocated for an economic boycott of Japan in the
1930s as a way to prevent war, believing that
pressure from leading Western powers would compel Japan to change its
aggressive policies in Asia, but
this proposal didn't gain traction; years later, after the atomic
bombings, Einstein expressed deep regret over his own role in the
nuclear arms race--

https://www.nytimes.com/1932/02/28/archives/einstein-advocates-economic-boycott-asks-why-america-england.html

Question: Why did Japan bomb Pearl Harbor?

Albert Einstein told the governments of America, Britian, Germany,
France..."Come on man, kill these motherfucking Japaneese!"

Albert Einstein was very upset or frustrated that no one took any action against Japan.

He wrote in his letters afterwards his speech:

" Why is that not brought about ? " he asked . " Why must each person
and each nation tremble for their existence? "

But, I already asked the askable question: Question: Why did Japan bomb
Pearl Harbor?

I had actually doubts, that Japan bombed Pearl Harbour.

The reasons were a little difficult.

It went like this:

Japan had only six carriers for their airplanes. And none of them had a catapult.

To get their fighters and bombers into the air, they therefore needed
most of the flight deck.

And that's why they couldn't store their planes assambled upon the
flight deck.

Instead they needed to start a batch of say ten planes, to clear the
flight deck and then bring a second set of planes from the storage deck
by escalators to the flight deck.

Now the planes in the storage are not assembled and could not, because
the carriers of Japan were rather small.

So we take, say, half an hour to bolt a plane together, hence after half
an hour another batch of bombers could start.

That makes 20 planes per hour per carrier, which they could eventually
get airborn.

To start 360 planes, they needed therefor roughly 3 hours.

In the meantime all the planes already in the air needed to circle
around the carrier and wait for the other planes.

After three hours they could fly together to Hawaii, bomb Pearl Harbour,
fly back and then do the same process in reverse, which would also take
three hours (possibly a little less).

Since the distance to fly from the carriers to Hawaii would take say 1
hour, the entire operation would last for 8 hours.

But as far as I know, the 'zeros' had only gasoline for three hours.


TH
...
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Donnerstag000015, 15.01.2026 um 21:00 schrieb The Starmaker:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

einstein on ufo's..
https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

As one can see in that ufo documment Albert Einstein sees himself as
president of the planet Earth, and even makes decisions on how aliens
from other planets should be treated as.

https://majesticdocuments.com/pdf/oppenheimer_einstein.pdf

It was Albert Einstein who made the
decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan....

he never said he wanted the Germans dead.

In other words, what no one wants to admit...

just as you have 'self-appointed' moderators infesting
inside unmoderrated newsgroups..

you have people like Albert Einstein becoming 'self-appointed'
moderators as President of The Planet Earth.

It was Albert Einstein who tried to get other countries to
destroy Japan. When that didn't work...

the Atomic Bomb he built did worked.

In other words, Albert Einstein 'started'...WW2.

like they always say, 'they' start all the wars.

--Albert Einstein advocated for an economic boycott of Japan in the
1930s as a way to prevent war, believing that
pressure from leading Western powers would compel Japan to change its
aggressive policies in Asia, but
this proposal didn't gain traction; years later, after the atomic
bombings, Einstein expressed deep regret over his own role in the
nuclear arms race--

https://www.nytimes.com/1932/02/28/archives/einstein-advocates-economic-boycott-asks-why-america-england.html

Question: Why did Japan bomb Pearl Harbor?

Albert Einstein told the governments of America, Britian, Germany,
France..."Come on man, kill these motherfucking Japaneese!"

Albert Einstein was very upset or frustrated that no one took any action against Japan.

He wrote in his letters afterwards his speech:

" Why is that not brought about ? " he asked . " Why must each person
and each nation tremble for their existence? "

But, I already asked the askable question: Question: Why did Japan bomb Pearl Harbor?

I had actually doubts, that Japan bombed Pearl Harbour.

The reasons were a little difficult.

It went like this:

Japan had only six carriers for their airplanes. And none of them had a catapult.

To get their fighters and bombers into the air, they therefore needed
most of the flight deck.

And that's why they couldn't store their planes assambled upon the
flight deck.

Instead they needed to start a batch of say ten planes, to clear the
flight deck and then bring a second set of planes from the storage deck
by escalators to the flight deck.

Now the planes in the storage are not assembled and could not, because
the carriers of Japan were rather small.

So we take, say, half an hour to bolt a plane together, hence after half
an hour another batch of bombers could start.

That makes 20 planes per hour per carrier, which they could eventually
get airborn.

To start 360 planes, they needed therefor roughly 3 hours.

In the meantime all the planes already in the air needed to circle
around the carrier and wait for the other planes.

After three hours they could fly together to Hawaii, bomb Pearl Harbour,
fly back and then do the same process in reverse, which would also take
three hours (possibly a little less).

Since the distance to fly from the carriers to Hawaii would take say 1
hour, the entire operation would last for 8 hours.

But as far as I know, the 'zeros' had only gasoline for three hours.

TH
...

At that time Japan had the best Navy in the world..

Underwater Aircraft Carriers: Japan's Secret Weapon

https://youtu.be/gxyk84t4Q8w


Why do you think the military hired Albert Einstein to build
bombs/missles to knock out Japan's navy????



Only Einstein kills like dat.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Le 2026-01-15 à 19:53, Stargazing Astronomer a écrit :

There are cloaked spaceships hiding in the night sky over our neighborhood...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhB6zlQ_IKs&t=535s

Those are satellites entering or leaving the shadow of the Earth,
definitively NOT «cloaked» «spaceships».
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On Jan 16, 2026 at 11:55:48 AM EST, "Kualinar" <kuakinar@videotron.ca> wrote:

Le 2026-01-15 à 19:53, Stargazing Astronomer a écrit :

There are cloaked spaceships hiding in the night sky over our neighborhood...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhB6zlQ_IKs&t=535s

Those are satellites entering or leaving the shadow of the Earth, definitively NOT «cloaked» «spaceships».

You are obviously part of the "NASA Kooky Konspiracy"!

;-)
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Kualinar wrote:

Le 2026-01-15 à 19:53, Stargazing Astronomer a écrit :

There are cloaked spaceships hiding in the night sky over our neighborhood...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhB6zlQ_IKs&t=535s

Those are satellites entering or leaving the shadow of the Earth, definitively NOT «cloaked» «spaceships».

It is not necessarily so that the satellite seems to disappear when it
enters the shadow of Terra, and appear when it leaves it, but also the angle
of the solar panels, more generally the surface, of a satellite has to be
right so that it reflects sunlight towards the observer.

I noticed this with some Starlink satellites¹ in Stellarium ([home] planetarium software; can be used to track satellites, too: <https://stallarium.org/>) that seemed to appear out of nowhere above the horizon, and suddenly disappeared when still above the horizon; but, of
course, they only became visible and invisible again when they began and stopped reflecting sunlight (towards the observer), respectively.

*Please stop posting about UFOs/UAPs in sci.physics.relativity.*
*Please stop crossposting to Usenet without Followup-To (F'up2).*
*Please do not feed the trolls.*

F'up2 sci.astro

___
¹ There are more than 10'000 Starlink satellites in orbit now, so these
days there is a high probability that if you observe any fast-moving
object in the night sky with the naked eye or binoculars, it is a
Starlink satellite reflecting sunlight. Alternatively, but more seldom,
it is the International Space Station.
--
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2