• [OT] Name of the Solar System (was: Names.)

    From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn@PointedEars@web.de to sci.physics.relativity on Wed Jan 7 21:11:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    cld wrote:
    Our solar system should have a name, to distinguish it from all the
    other solar systems.

    1. You have posted to sci.physics.relativity. This is off-topic here.
    You should have posted to <news:alt.astronomy>. Next time, check
    <news:news.newusers.questions> to determine the right newsgroup for
    your question/discussion/problem.

    2. Apropos names: Your postings will be more likely read if you post
    under your real name. Statistically, single-named posters are more
    likely to be trolls or lusers; those only posting under acronyms
    doubly so.

    3. It is required that the "From" header field of your posting contains
    an e-mail address. "clowd@nimbus.net.inv" is not because there is no
    top-level domain ".inv", but there could be in the future. See also
    RFC 5536 "NetNews Article Format".

    4. "Solar System" *is* the official name used by the International
    Astronomical Union (IAU), and the preceding is the recommended
    spelling. However, I grant you that since the (yet unfinished?)
    redesign of the IAU Web site, it is even more difficult to find it
    there.[1]

    There is only one Solar System because there is only one star called Sol,
    Latin for English "the Sun" ("Sol" is derived from the Roman deity "Sol
    Invictus", "the unconquered sun"[2]; "sun" developed from Old English
    "sunne", cognate with similar words in other Germanic languages[3]),
    which is the primary of that planetary system. Other planetary systems
    ought NOT be called "solar systems".

    Use of the name "Sol" can also be found in astronomy software, for
    example Celestia. For that reason I prefer the name "Sol System" that is
    also found in good science-fiction.

    ____
    [1] <https://web.archive.org/web/20250301230114/https://www.iau.org/public/themes/naming/>
    [2] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sol_(Roman_mythology)>
    [3] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Etymology>

    ¹ Note that the term "star system" for such a system of celestial objects
    around a star or multiple stars, that you often find in popular-scientific
    and science-fiction contexts is wrong. The term "star system" exists in
    astronomy, but means a system of two or more stars, not planets or smaller
    bodies, orbiting each other. For example, the Alpha Centauri System is
    correctly named so because it consists of the stars Alpha Centauri A
    (Rigil Kentaurus), Alpha Centauri B (Toliman), and Alpha Centauri C
    (Proxima Centauri): <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri>
    --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh on Thu Jan 8 23:14:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    cld wrote:
    Our solar system should have a name, to distinguish it from all the
    other solar systems.

    1. You have posted to sci.physics.relativity. This is off-topic here.
    You should have posted to <news:alt.astronomy>. Next time, check
    <news:news.newusers.questions> to determine the right newsgroup for
    your question/discussion/problem.

    2. Apropos names: Your postings will be more likely read if you post
    under your real name. Statistically, single-named posters are more
    likely to be trolls or lusers; those only posting under acronyms
    doubly so.

    3. It is required that the "From" header field of your posting contains
    an e-mail address. "clowd@nimbus.net.inv" is not because there is no
    top-level domain ".inv", but there could be in the future. See also
    RFC 5536 "NetNews Article Format".

    4. "Solar System" *is* the official name used by the International
    Astronomical Union (IAU), and the preceding is the recommended
    spelling. However, I grant you that since the (yet unfinished?)
    redesign of the IAU Web site, it is even more difficult to find it
    there.[1]

    There is only one Solar System because there is only one star called Sol,
    Latin for English "the Sun" ("Sol" is derived from the Roman deity "Sol
    Invictus", "the unconquered sun"[2]; "sun" developed from Old English
    "sunne", cognate with similar words in other Germanic languages[3]),
    which is the primary of that planetary system. Other planetary systems
    ought NOT be called "solar systems".

    Use of the name "Sol" can also be found in astronomy software, for
    example Celestia. For that reason I prefer the name "Sol System" that is
    also found in good science-fiction.

    ____
    [1] <https://web.archive.org/web/20250301230114/https://www.iau.org/public/themes/naming/>
    [2] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sol_(Roman_mythology)>
    [3] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Etymology>

    ¹ Note that the term "star system" for such a system of celestial objects
    around a star or multiple stars, that you often find in popular-scientific
    and science-fiction contexts is wrong. The term "star system" exists in
    astronomy, but means a system of two or more stars, not planets or smaller
    bodies, orbiting each other. For example, the Alpha Centauri System is
    correctly named so because it consists of the stars Alpha Centauri A
    (Rigil Kentaurus), Alpha Centauri B (Toliman), and Alpha Centauri C
    (Proxima Centauri): <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri>
    --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

    That's ALL sound sooo confusing...
    all dis talk of sol, sun, Roman days...

    It was then when Caesar and Jesus Christ time...


    It's not the God of the Sun that the romans were worshipping...it was

    the Sun of God...the Sol of God...the Son of God.

    I understand how the confusion came about..but please get dis stuff
    right!

    dat star in the sky everyone was following is the sol.

    God is the Light.

    yous are mistaken the sun of god, or god of the son, it's the son of
    God!


    Yous speld Sonday wrong...

    then Monday.

    Sunday is God day.

    Solday.

    Sonday.

    Jesus
    is
    the
    Sun
    of
    God.

    Sunday is
    God day.

    Atheist Day is Hellday.

    Hell of a week if you ask me..

    Fat ugly girls like to protest to pick up an ice guy.


    How do you spel Learing anyway?


    I see Trump wants to get rid of all the
    communists in the USA hemisphere..

    dat explains why they killed JFK, he
    let those communists in our hemisphere.

    dat to me is punishable by death.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh on Fri Jan 9 21:24:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    cld wrote:
    Our solar system should have a name, to distinguish it from all the
    other solar systems.

    1. You have posted to sci.physics.relativity. This is off-topic here.
    You should have posted to <news:alt.astronomy>. Next time, check
    <news:news.newusers.questions> to determine the right newsgroup for
    your question/discussion/problem.

    2. Apropos names: Your postings will be more likely read if you post
    under your real name. Statistically, single-named posters are more
    likely to be trolls or lusers; those only posting under acronyms
    doubly so.

    3. It is required that the "From" header field of your posting contains
    an e-mail address. "clowd@nimbus.net.inv" is not because there is no
    top-level domain ".inv", but there could be in the future. See also
    RFC 5536 "NetNews Article Format".

    4. "Solar System" *is* the official name used by the International
    Astronomical Union (IAU), and the preceding is the recommended
    spelling. However, I grant you that since the (yet unfinished?)
    redesign of the IAU Web site, it is even more difficult to find it
    there.[1]

    There is only one Solar System because there is only one star called Sol,
    Latin for English "the Sun" ("Sol" is derived from the Roman deity "Sol
    Invictus", "the unconquered sun"[2]; "sun" developed from Old English
    "sunne", cognate with similar words in other Germanic languages[3]),
    which is the primary of that planetary system. Other planetary systems
    ought NOT be called "solar systems".

    Use of the name "Sol" can also be found in astronomy software, for
    example Celestia. For that reason I prefer the name "Sol System" that is
    also found in good science-fiction.

    ____
    [1] <https://web.archive.org/web/20250301230114/https://www.iau.org/public/themes/naming/>
    [2] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sol_(Roman_mythology)>
    [3] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Etymology>

    ¹ Note that the term "star system" for such a system of celestial objects
    around a star or multiple stars, that you often find in popular-scientific
    and science-fiction contexts is wrong. The term "star system" exists in
    astronomy, but means a system of two or more stars, not planets or smaller
    bodies, orbiting each other. For example, the Alpha Centauri System is
    correctly named so because it consists of the stars Alpha Centauri A
    (Rigil Kentaurus), Alpha Centauri B (Toliman), and Alpha Centauri C
    (Proxima Centauri): <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri>
    --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

    That's ALL sound sooo confusing...
    all dis talk of sol, sun, Roman days...

    It was then when Caesar and Jesus Christ time...

    It's not the God of the Sun that the romans were worshipping...it was

    the Sun of God...the Sol of God...the Son of God.

    I understand how the confusion came about..but please get dis stuff
    right!

    dat star in the sky everyone was following is the sol.

    God is the Light.

    yous are mistaken the sun of god, or god of the son, it's the son of
    God!

    Yous speld Sonday wrong...

    then Monday.

    Sunday is God day.

    Solday.

    Sonday.

    Jesus
    is
    the
    Sun
    of
    God.

    Sunday is
    God day.

    It's possible that 'the bible writers' CHANGED The Son Of God to God of
    the Sun...
    you know how these Jesus killers are.

    They shoot babies, don't they.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh on Fri Jan 9 21:27:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    cld wrote:
    Our solar system should have a name, to distinguish it from all the
    other solar systems.

    1. You have posted to sci.physics.relativity. This is off-topic here.
    You should have posted to <news:alt.astronomy>. Next time, check
    <news:news.newusers.questions> to determine the right newsgroup for
    your question/discussion/problem.

    2. Apropos names: Your postings will be more likely read if you post
    under your real name. Statistically, single-named posters are more
    likely to be trolls or lusers; those only posting under acronyms
    doubly so.

    3. It is required that the "From" header field of your posting contains
    an e-mail address. "clowd@nimbus.net.inv" is not because there is no
    top-level domain ".inv", but there could be in the future. See also
    RFC 5536 "NetNews Article Format".

    4. "Solar System" *is* the official name used by the International
    Astronomical Union (IAU), and the preceding is the recommended
    spelling. However, I grant you that since the (yet unfinished?)
    redesign of the IAU Web site, it is even more difficult to find it
    there.[1]

    There is only one Solar System because there is only one star called Sol,
    Latin for English "the Sun" ("Sol" is derived from the Roman deity "Sol
    Invictus", "the unconquered sun"[2]; "sun" developed from Old English
    "sunne", cognate with similar words in other Germanic languages[3]),
    which is the primary of that planetary system. Other planetary systems
    ought NOT be called "solar systems".

    Use of the name "Sol" can also be found in astronomy software, for
    example Celestia. For that reason I prefer the name "Sol System" that is
    also found in good science-fiction.

    ____
    [1] <https://web.archive.org/web/20250301230114/https://www.iau.org/public/themes/naming/>
    [2] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sol_(Roman_mythology)>
    [3] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Etymology>

    ¹ Note that the term "star system" for such a system of celestial objects
    around a star or multiple stars, that you often find in popular-scientific
    and science-fiction contexts is wrong. The term "star system" exists in
    astronomy, but means a system of two or more stars, not planets or smaller
    bodies, orbiting each other. For example, the Alpha Centauri System is
    correctly named so because it consists of the stars Alpha Centauri A
    (Rigil Kentaurus), Alpha Centauri B (Toliman), and Alpha Centauri C
    (Proxima Centauri): <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri>
    --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

    That's ALL sound sooo confusing...
    all dis talk of sol, sun, Roman days...

    It was then when Caesar and Jesus Christ time...

    It's not the God of the Sun that the romans were worshipping...it was

    the Sun of God...the Sol of God...the Son of God.

    I understand how the confusion came about..but please get dis stuff
    right!

    dat star in the sky everyone was following is the sol.

    God is the Light.

    yous are mistaken the sun of god, or god of the son, it's the son of
    God!

    Yous speld Sonday wrong...

    then Monday.

    Sunday is God day.

    Solday.

    Sonday.

    Jesus
    is
    the
    Sun
    of
    God.

    Sunday is
    God day.

    Atheist Day is Hellday.

    Hell of a week if you ask me..

    Fat ugly girls like to protest to pick up an ice guy.

    How do you spel Learing anyway?

    I see Trump wants to get rid of all the
    communists in the USA hemisphere..

    dat explains why they killed JFK, he
    let those communists in our hemisphere.

    dat to me is punishable by death.


    To ALLOW communists to enter our hemisphere, and
    take over Cuba in OUR hemisphere...is unacceptable.

    The only good commie is a dead commie.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh on Sat Jan 10 08:28:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    cld wrote:
    Our solar system should have a name, to distinguish it from all the other solar systems.

    1. You have posted to sci.physics.relativity. This is off-topic here.
    You should have posted to <news:alt.astronomy>. Next time, check
    <news:news.newusers.questions> to determine the right newsgroup for
    your question/discussion/problem.

    2. Apropos names: Your postings will be more likely read if you post
    under your real name. Statistically, single-named posters are more
    likely to be trolls or lusers; those only posting under acronyms
    doubly so.

    3. It is required that the "From" header field of your posting contains
    an e-mail address. "clowd@nimbus.net.inv" is not because there is no
    top-level domain ".inv", but there could be in the future. See also
    RFC 5536 "NetNews Article Format".

    4. "Solar System" *is* the official name used by the International
    Astronomical Union (IAU), and the preceding is the recommended
    spelling. However, I grant you that since the (yet unfinished?)
    redesign of the IAU Web site, it is even more difficult to find it
    there.[1]

    There is only one Solar System because there is only one star called Sol,
    Latin for English "the Sun" ("Sol" is derived from the Roman deity "Sol
    Invictus", "the unconquered sun"[2]; "sun" developed from Old English
    "sunne", cognate with similar words in other Germanic languages[3]),
    which is the primary of that planetary system. Other planetary systems
    ought NOT be called "solar systems".

    Use of the name "Sol" can also be found in astronomy software, for
    example Celestia. For that reason I prefer the name "Sol System" that is
    also found in good science-fiction.

    ____
    [1] <https://web.archive.org/web/20250301230114/https://www.iau.org/public/themes/naming/>
    [2] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sol_(Roman_mythology)>
    [3] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Etymology>

    ¹ Note that the term "star system" for such a system of celestial objects
    around a star or multiple stars, that you often find in popular-scientific
    and science-fiction contexts is wrong. The term "star system" exists in
    astronomy, but means a system of two or more stars, not planets or smaller
    bodies, orbiting each other. For example, the Alpha Centauri System is
    correctly named so because it consists of the stars Alpha Centauri A
    (Rigil Kentaurus), Alpha Centauri B (Toliman), and Alpha Centauri C
    (Proxima Centauri): <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri>
    --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

    That's ALL sound sooo confusing...
    all dis talk of sol, sun, Roman days...

    It was then when Caesar and Jesus Christ time...

    It's not the God of the Sun that the romans were worshipping...it was

    the Sun of God...the Sol of God...the Son of God.

    I understand how the confusion came about..but please get dis stuff
    right!

    dat star in the sky everyone was following is the sol.

    God is the Light.

    yous are mistaken the sun of god, or god of the son, it's the son of
    God!

    Yous speld Sonday wrong...

    then Monday.

    Sunday is God day.

    Solday.

    Sonday.

    Jesus
    is
    the
    Sun
    of
    God.

    Sunday is
    God day.

    Atheist Day is Hellday.

    Hell of a week if you ask me..

    Fat ugly girls like to protest to pick up an ice guy.

    How do you spel Learing anyway?

    I see Trump wants to get rid of all the
    communists in the USA hemisphere..

    dat explains why they killed JFK, he
    let those communists in our hemisphere.

    dat to me is punishable by death.

    To ALLOW communists to enter our hemisphere, and
    take over Cuba in OUR hemisphere...is unacceptable.

    The only good commie is a dead commie.


    In other words, President Trump is surrounded today by a bunch of
    cowards like
    JFK who let communists in OUR hemisphere.

    If Putin or China threatens to use the atomic bombs on us, the cowards
    give in.

    dats how they got Cuba.

    Trump is surrounded by cowards left and right.

    He is not going to give in, but the cowards want to give in.

    dat was jfk mistake.

    get rid of the cowards.

    I know how to deal with Putin...

    I'LL FUCKING KILL HIM!


    done.

    next?

    oh, dat chink in china????

    don't they all pee sitting down????

    dats my question.

    Do all chinks pee sitting down?
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh on Sat Jan 10 12:57:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    cld wrote:
    Our solar system should have a name, to distinguish it from all the other solar systems.

    1. You have posted to sci.physics.relativity. This is off-topic here.
    You should have posted to <news:alt.astronomy>. Next time, check
    <news:news.newusers.questions> to determine the right newsgroup for
    your question/discussion/problem.

    2. Apropos names: Your postings will be more likely read if you post
    under your real name. Statistically, single-named posters are more
    likely to be trolls or lusers; those only posting under acronyms
    doubly so.

    3. It is required that the "From" header field of your posting contains
    an e-mail address. "clowd@nimbus.net.inv" is not because there is no
    top-level domain ".inv", but there could be in the future. See also
    RFC 5536 "NetNews Article Format".

    4. "Solar System" *is* the official name used by the International
    Astronomical Union (IAU), and the preceding is the recommended
    spelling. However, I grant you that since the (yet unfinished?)
    redesign of the IAU Web site, it is even more difficult to find it
    there.[1]

    There is only one Solar System because there is only one star called Sol,
    Latin for English "the Sun" ("Sol" is derived from the Roman deity "Sol
    Invictus", "the unconquered sun"[2]; "sun" developed from Old English
    "sunne", cognate with similar words in other Germanic languages[3]),
    which is the primary of that planetary system. Other planetary systems
    ought NOT be called "solar systems".

    Use of the name "Sol" can also be found in astronomy software, for
    example Celestia. For that reason I prefer the name "Sol System" that is
    also found in good science-fiction.

    ____
    [1] <https://web.archive.org/web/20250301230114/https://www.iau.org/public/themes/naming/>
    [2] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sol_(Roman_mythology)>
    [3] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Etymology>

    ¹ Note that the term "star system" for such a system of celestial objects
    around a star or multiple stars, that you often find in popular-scientific
    and science-fiction contexts is wrong. The term "star system" exists in
    astronomy, but means a system of two or more stars, not planets or smaller
    bodies, orbiting each other. For example, the Alpha Centauri System is
    correctly named so because it consists of the stars Alpha Centauri A
    (Rigil Kentaurus), Alpha Centauri B (Toliman), and Alpha Centauri C
    (Proxima Centauri): <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri> --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

    That's ALL sound sooo confusing...
    all dis talk of sol, sun, Roman days...

    It was then when Caesar and Jesus Christ time...

    It's not the God of the Sun that the romans were worshipping...it was

    the Sun of God...the Sol of God...the Son of God.

    I understand how the confusion came about..but please get dis stuff right!

    dat star in the sky everyone was following is the sol.

    God is the Light.

    yous are mistaken the sun of god, or god of the son, it's the son of
    God!

    Yous speld Sonday wrong...

    then Monday.

    Sunday is God day.

    Solday.

    Sonday.

    Jesus
    is
    the
    Sun
    of
    God.

    Sunday is
    God day.

    Atheist Day is Hellday.

    Hell of a week if you ask me..

    Fat ugly girls like to protest to pick up an ice guy.

    How do you spel Learing anyway?

    I see Trump wants to get rid of all the
    communists in the USA hemisphere..

    dat explains why they killed JFK, he
    let those communists in our hemisphere.

    dat to me is punishable by death.

    To ALLOW communists to enter our hemisphere, and
    take over Cuba in OUR hemisphere...is unacceptable.

    The only good commie is a dead commie.

    In other words, President Trump is surrounded today by a bunch of
    cowards like
    JFK who let communists in OUR hemisphere.

    If Putin or China threatens to use the atomic bombs on us, the cowards
    give in.

    dats how they got Cuba.

    Trump is surrounded by cowards left and right.

    He is not going to give in, but the cowards want to give in.

    dat was jfk mistake.

    get rid of the cowards.


    Here is how I would advise Trump to handle Putin...

    If Putin sez to Trump..."I'LL FUCKING DROP A NUCLUER BOMB ON MANHATTAN
    ISLAND AND MAKE IT LOOK LIKE GAZA!!!!"

    Trump should simply respond with... "Go ahead and see what happens."
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From squalk@sq@net.inv to sci.physics.relativity on Wed Jan 14 20:31:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
    cld wrote:

    2. Apropos names: Your postings will be more likely read if you post
    under your real name.

    ------------------------------------

    Originally, I opted to post on the newsgroups, rather than on the
    offshoots, because they allowed anonymous posting.

    A bid to avoid the grab of the internet for personal info.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ross Finlayson@ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com to sci.physics.relativity on Wed Jan 14 18:34:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    On 01/14/2026 12:31 PM, squalk wrote:
    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
    cld wrote:

    2. Apropos names: Your postings will be more likely read if you post
    under your real name.

    ------------------------------------

    Originally, I opted to post on the newsgroups, rather than on the
    offshoots, because they allowed anonymous posting.

    A bid to avoid the grab of the internet for personal info.

    It's not so bad when it's not abused.

    When it is though, misrepresentation over the Internet or
    generally is perceived as a sort of enhancement to justified
    penalty to crime.

    Basically relying on "e-mail address", as with regards to
    the association of identity with an e-mail address, many
    countries have laws in effect with regards to the verification
    of association of identity with an e-mail address, though that's
    a bit its own protocols for digital mail-box and the post and
    these kinds of things, with regards to delivery and identity.

    An e-mail address ending ".invalid", which is not a valid TLD,
    is somewhere though noted as a "valid invalid" way to write
    an e-mail address that doesn't exist.

    It's been a long time since just appending /s/ in an e-mail
    was a legal signature, "signed". I.e., in the positive sense,
    an e-mail address and an associated identity speaks for itself.




    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From squalk@sq@net.inv to sci.physics.relativity on Thu Jan 15 19:19:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Ross Finlayson wrote:
    On 01/14/2026 12:31 PM, squalk wrote:
    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
    cld wrote:

    2. Apropos names: Your postings will be more likely read if you post
        under your real name.

       ------------------------------------

    Originally, I opted to post on the newsgroups, rather than on the
    offshoots, because they allowed anonymous posting.

    A bid to avoid the grab of the internet for personal info.

    It's not so bad when it's not abused.

    When it is though, misrepresentation over the Internet or
    generally is perceived as a sort of enhancement to justified
    penalty to crime.

    Basically relying on "e-mail address", as with regards to
    the association of identity with an e-mail address, many
    countries have laws in effect with regards to the verification
    of association of identity with an e-mail address, though that's
    a bit its own protocols for digital mail-box and the post and
    these kinds of things, with regards to delivery and identity.

    An e-mail address ending ".invalid", which is not a valid TLD,
    is somewhere though noted as a "valid invalid" way to write
    an e-mail address that doesn't exist.

    It's been a long time since just appending /s/ in an e-mail
    was a legal signature, "signed". I.e., in the positive sense,
    an e-mail address and an associated identity speaks for itself.

    --------------------------------------

    Someone said, long ago, that writing .inv at the end of an email would
    save people from thinking that the email was a valid one.

    Dont be so complicated, say what is it that you mean.



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn@PointedEars@web.de to sci.physics.relativity on Thu Jan 15 23:31:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    squalk wrote:
    Someone said, long ago, that writing .inv at the end of an email would
    save people from thinking that the email was a valid one.

    You have been mislead to do "address munging", thereby to violating § 3.1.2
    of the Proposed Standard (as far as Network News is concerned, that is considered a quasi-standard) RFC 5536 "Netnews Article Format"; as that is
    not an e-mail address, but the "From" header field value must contain an
    e-mail address:

    <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5536#section-3.1.2>

    There is a suggestion (that was never on the Standards Track) to use a top-level domain (TLD) that was actually registered merely for testing ad documentation purposes, .invalid, on a regular basis in the "From" header
    field value in order to avoid getting e-mail spam due to e-mail addresses
    being harvested from Usenet by professional spammers, and some Usenet
    service providers allow that in their Terms of Use, sometimes only if a Reply-To header field is present, too (see below):

    <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2606#section-2> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.invalid>

    However, I (and several other Usenet regulars) consider that anti-social behavior, an abuse of that TLD (the "From" header field is specified to
    contain an e-mail address so that communication would be possible in
    private, too: to discuss off-topic subjects, to clarify misunderstanding
    in private etc.), and either score down such postings or filter them out entirely such that they never see/download them in the first place (I do
    the latter).

    Some people overlook this violation as long as a "Reply-To" header field
    whose value contains an actual e-mail address (a conforming user agent will automatically use that address when one attempts to reply in private). I do not, also because to my knowledge it is not possible to filter for the
    Reply-To header field *before* you download the entire message (it is not contained in the message overview list that can be obtained using NNTP that
    is retrieved when one "downloads headers").

    <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5536#section-3.2>

    See also:

    <http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>,

    especially

    <http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#intro&:~:text=we%20filter%20ruthlessly>

    HTH

    F'up2 poster
    --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2